Vibroengineering PROCEDIA

Vibroengineering Procedia

publishes articles presented at International Conferences on Vibroengineering.

Submit manuscript Browse Procedia

Vibroengineering Procedia (VP) ISSN (Print) 2345-0533, ISSN (Online) 2538-8479 publishes as short Conference papers presented at VIBROENGINEERING Conferences. Every consecutive Volume of Vibroengineering Procedia is dedicated to a separate Conference.

Authors of best papers presented at International Conferences on VIBROENGINEERING are invited to extend their manuscripts to full journal papers which are considered for publication in Journal of Vibroengineering (indexed in SCI) and Journal of Measurements in Engineering (indexed in SCI, Inspec, EBSCO and Gale Cengage).

International Conference Series on VIBROENGINEERING is an ideal platform for presenting your recent results in the area of Vibroengineering to the scientific and engineering community Worldwide. Also, International Conference Series on Vibroengineering provides a unique opportunity for building not only your research & industrial network, but also your career in this thriving field of Vibroengineering.

The List of Principal Topics

  • Mechanical vibrations and applications;
  • Fault diagnosis based on vibration signal analysis;
  • Vibration generation and control
  • Seismic engineering and applications;
  • Modal analysis and applications;
  • Vibration in transportation engineering;
  • Flow induced structural vibrations;
  • Oscillations in biomedical engineering;
  • Chaos, nonlinear dynamics and applications;
  • Oscillations in Electrical Engineering;
  • Accoustics, noise control and engineering applications;
  • Fractional dynamics and applications;

Journal is indexed in major Scientific Databases

  • SCOPUS: ELSEVIER Bibliographic Database.
  • COMPENDEX: ELSEVIER Bibliographic Database.
  • EBSCO:
    • Academic Search Complete;
    • Computers & Applied Sciences Complete;
    • Central & Eastern European Academic Source;
    • Current Abstracts;
    • TOC Premier.
  • Gale Cengage Learning: Academic OneFile Custom Periodical.
  • INSPEC: OCLC. The Database for Physics, Electronics and Computing.
  • Google Scholar:
  • CNKI Scholar:
  • Crossref:
Open Access Vibroenginering Procedia becomes Open Access beginning with 2018, Volume 18. By 'open access' to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY).


With great excitement, we'd like to present our conferences schedule in 2018:

  • 31st Conference in Dubai, United Arab Emirates 20-22nd of April, 2018 "Vibration and Acoustics in Civil Engineering and Fault Diagnostics"
  • 32nd Conference in Brno, Czech Republic 22-24th May, 2018 "Dynamics and Acoustics in Automotive Engineering"
  • 33rd Conference in Zittau, Germany 24-26th of September, 2018 "Vibration and Acoustics: Challanges in Mechanical Engineering"
  • 34th Conference in Shanghai, China 19-21st of October, 2018 "Vibration Engineering – Problems and Applications"
  • 35th Conference in Mexico City, Mexico 13-15th of November, 2018 "Vibration, Waves and Acoustics-Engineering Problems and Applications"
  • 36th Conference in Greater Noida (Delhi) India 13-15th of December, 2018 "Dynamics, Noise, Vibration and Control"

*Topics are not limited to the main theme. More information can be found at

Since 1999 JVE International is the Organizer of a series of International Conferences which attract speakers from more than 30 around globe. From 2013 till 2015, International Conferences on Vibroengineering were organized at two different locations - one in Europe - another in the Far East. Such venue localization helped our Authors to minimize their travel costs and benefit to the Internalization of our Conference Series.

The number of conferences and different locations grew substantially over the past years of JVE Conferences:


Editor in Chief

Prof. Minvydas Ragulskis

Kaunas University of Technology, JVE International, Lithuania

Editorial Board
H. Adeli
The Ohio State University, (USA)
V. Babitsky
Loughborough University, (UK)
R. Bansevičius
Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)
M. Bayat
Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, (Iran)
I. Blekhman
Mekhanobr – Tekhnika Corporation, (Russia)
K. Bousson
University of Beira Interior, (Portugal)
A. Bubulis
Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)
R. Burdzik
Silesian University of Technology, (Poland)
M. S. Cao
Hohai University, (China)
Lu Chen
Beihang University, (China)
F. Chernousko
Institute for Problems in Mechanics, (Russia)
Z. Dabrowski
Warsaw University of Technology, (Poland)
Y. Davydov
Institute of Machine Building Mechanics, (Russia)
J. Duhovnik
University of Ljubljana, (Slovenia)
S. Ersoy
Marmara University, (Turkey)
A. Fedaravičius
Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)
R. Ganiev
Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, (Russia)
W. H. Hsieh
National Formosa University, (Taiwan)
V. Kaminskas
Vytautas Magnus University, (Lithuania)
V. Kappatos
University of Southern Denmark, (Denmark)
V. Klyuev
Association Spektr – Group, (Russia)
G. Kulvietis
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, (Lithuania)
V. Lyalin
Izhevsk State Technical University, (Russia)
R. Martonka
Technical University of Liberec, (Czech Republic)
R. Maskeliūnas
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, (Lithuania)
L. E. Muñoz
Universidad de los Andes, (Colombia)
N. Nistico
University of Roma La Sapienza, (Italy)
V. Ostaševičius
Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)
A. Palevičius
Kaunas University of Technology, (Lithuania)
G. Panovko
Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, (Russia)
L. Qiu
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (China)
Kazimieras Ragulskis
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
S. Rakheja
Concordia University, (Canada)
V. Ranjan
Bennett University, (India)
V. Royzman
Khmelnitskiy National University, (Ukraine)
G. E. Sandoval-Romero
The National Autonomous University of Mexico, (Mexico)
M. A. F. Sanjuan
University Rey Juan Carlos, (Spain)
E. Shahmatov
Samara State Aerospace University, (Russia)
A. El Sinawi
The Petroleum Institute, (United Arab Emirates)
G. Song
University of Houston, (USA)
S. Toyama
Tokyo A&T University, (Japan)
K. Uchino
The Pennsylvania State University, (USA)
A. Vakhguelt
Nazarbayev University, (Kazakhstan)
A. Valiulis
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, (Lithuania)
P. Vasiljev
Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, (Lithuania)
V. Veikutis
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, (Lithuania)
J. Viba
Riga Technical University, (Latvia)
J. Wallaschek
Leibniz University Hannover, (Germany)
Xiao-Jun Yang
China University of Mining and Technology, (China)

Review Process

All manuscripts will be assigned to at least two qualified reviewers through 7 steps described below. Decisions will be made as rapidly as possible, and the journal strives to return reviewers’ comments to authors within 4 weeks.

On receiving an article, the Editorial office will pre-screen your manuscript in 1 week. The Editor in charge of the manuscript will check whether the manuscript is valid, does fall into the scope of the Journal, the presentation language is fluent, and the contribution to the state of the art is clear.

Following is a formal review process accomplished by external anonymous reviewers. Please note that the final decision on the acceptance / rejection of your manuscript is upon the Editor-in-Chief or one of the Associate Editors.

  1. Manuscript Submission – A manuscript code is assigned to every submission – authors are urged to use this code for any further communication regarding this manuscript. The manuscript is assigned to one of the Associated Editors (members of the Editorial Board of the Journal).
  2. Pre-reviewing (Editorial Office) – Initial Screening of the Manuscript – the Manuscript can be rejected or forwarded to the peer review process at this stage. A Reject decision can be immediately reached if the anti-plagiarism software does show a non-satisfactory score (over 5 %).
  3. Peer Review – External Anonymous Reviewers are assigned (if themanuscript is not rejected up to this point).
  4. Reviewer’s reports are collected by at the Editorial Office of the Journal. The Associated Editor is either rejecting the Manuscript – or requesting a revision from the authors based on the Reviewers’ comments (Minor, Major Revision requests or the Reject recommendation).
  5. Authors return their revised manuscript to the Editorial Office. The Associated Editor is taking a decision – Accept, the Second Round of Revision, or Reject – the decision is communicated to the Authors. The process is iterated to the point No. 2 if an additional revision is requested by the reviewers.
  6. Authors are allowed to perform two rounds of revisions. If Reviewers are not convinced by the arguments of authors after the second round of revisions – the manuscript is automatically rejected. In case the two assigned reviewers do have conflicting recommendations, a judge reviser (usually selected from the members of the Editorial Board of the Journal) is invited to give a final recommendation.
  7. The final decision is communicated to the Authors.

Conditions of Acceptance

Each article submitted to JVE will be accepted or rejected according to the originality, contribution to the state of the art in the field, the fitness to the scope of the Journal, quality of content, and presentation of the submitted manuscript.

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

For all parties involved in the process of publishing (the author, the journal editor(s), peer reviewers and the publisher) it is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior. The ethics statements for our journal are based on Code of Conduct and Best-Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors (Committee on Publication Ethics, 2011).

Duties of the Editors-in-Chief and the Associate Editor

Fair play

Submitted manuscripts are evaluated for their intellectual and scientific content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The Editor-in-Chief, the handling Associated Editor responsible for the submitted manuscript and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an Editor's own research without the explicit written consent of the author(s).

Publication decisions

The Editor-in-Chief of the journal or the handling Associate Editor is responsible for deciding which of the submitted articles should be published. The Editor-in-Chief and the handling Associate Editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's Editorial Board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor-in-Chief may confer with the handling Associate Editor, other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Responsibilities of peer reviewers

Contribution to editorial decisions

Peer review assists the Editor-in-Chief and the handling Associate Editor in making editorial decisions and, through the editorial communication with the author, may also assist the author in improving the manuscript.


Any invited referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should immediately notify the Editor-in-Chief so that alternative reviewers can be contacted.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except if authorized by the Editor-in-Chief.

Standards of objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inacceptable. Referees should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the Editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published data of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the submitted manuscript.

Duties of authors

Reporting standards

Authors reporting results of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Parallel submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of a manuscript

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as coauthors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be named in an Acknowledgement section. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authorsv(according to the above definition) and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the author list of the manuscript, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Data access and retention

Authors could be asked to provide the raw data of their study together with the paper for editorial review. In any event, authors should ensure accessibility of such data to other competent professionals for at least ten years after publication (preferably via an institutional or subject-based data repository or other data center), provided that the confidentiality of the participants can be protected and legal rights concerning proprietary data do not preclude their release.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the authors must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or their interpretation in the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal’s Editor-in-Chief or publisher and cooperate with them to either retract the paper or to publish an appropriate erratum. The publisher has the right to retract any published manuscript(s) with or without prior notification to the author(s).

Publisher’s confirmation

In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism the publisher, in close collaboration with the Editor-in-Chief, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum or, in the most severe cases, the complete retraction of the affected work.

The Publisher and the Journal do not discriminate on the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran status, national origin, race, gender, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in its publishing programs, services and activities.

VP CrossMark Policy

CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative to providing a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of an article or other published content. By applying the CrossMark logo, JVE is committed to maintain the content it publishes and to alert readers to changes if and when they occur.

JVE International recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and takes care of the highest importance to maintain trust in the authority of its electronic archive.

Clicking the CrossMark logo on a document will provide you its current status and will also give you additional publication-record information about the document.

For more information on CrossMark, please visit the CrossMark site.

JVE content that will have the CrossMark logo is restricted to the current and future journal content.