The peer reviewer is responsible for critically reading and evaluating a manuscript in their specialty field, and then providing respectful, constructive, and honest feedback to authors about their submission.
The review must be a plain text without any equations (equations are allowed in plain LaTex style if really necessary) and without figures.
A review report should give answers to these questions.
- Language. Is the presentation clear and sound? Does English style need a revision?
- Abstract. Is it clear and concise? Does it represent the essence of the research and the results?
- Introduction. Is the literature review appropriate? Is the motivation of the research stated clearly?
- Presentation. Is the presentation technically clear and sound?
- The experimental setup and engineering or mathematical model. Is everything correct and well described?
- Results. Are results clear and sound?
- Contribution to the state of the art in the field. Are this study and the presented results new?
- Conclusions. Are conclusions clear?
- References. Is this article free of self-citations? Is the citation geography wide enough?
- Impact (the most important point). Will this paper attract the attention and citations from the International Engineering Community?