Estimation of performance characteristics of a controlled shockabsorber affected by the magnetic field and temperature on rheological properties of the magnetorheological fluid
Viachaslau Bilyk^{1} , Eugenia Korobko^{2} , Algimantas Bubulis^{3}
^{1, 2}Luikov A.V. Heat and Mass Transfer Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus,, 15 P. Brovki st., Minsk, 220072,, Belarus
^{3}Kaunas University of Technology, Kęstučio 27, LT44312, Kaunas, Lithuania
^{1}Corresponding author
Vibroengineering PROCEDIA, Vol. 3, 2014, p. 331336.
Accepted 22 September 2014; published 10 October 2014
Copyright © 2014 JVE International Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
JVE Conferences
The mathematical model of MR fluid flow in an annular channel of the MR shockabsorber taking into account forces of dry friction and gas friction in a pneumatic camera, dependence rheological properties of the MR fluid on shear rate, temperature and magnetic flux density is developed. Performance characteristics of the MR shockabsorber (dependences of force on value of control electric signal taking into account of shockabsorber geometry, rod displacement, rheological properties of MR fluid, temperature) are calculated. The analysis of influence of the magnetic field and temperature values on the MR shockabsorber performance characteristics depending on amplitudes and frequencies of piston movement is carried out. The resistance force with growth of magnetic flux density increases 40 times. But the resistance force with growth of temperature from 20°C to 80°C decreases 7 times, in an magnetic field ($B=$ 500 mT), and 2 times, without a field ($B=$ 0 mT).
Keywords: magnetorheological fluid, rheological properties, temperature, magnetic flux density, shockabsorber, mathematical model, simulation, performance characteristics, force.
1. Introduction
Now active development of new compositions of magnetorheological (MR) fluids, theoretical and experimental research of their rheological properties and search of their practical application in the technician are conducted [13].
The most demanded application area of MR fluids is the machinery construction [3, 4]. In the scientific and technical literature various variants of active and semiactive cushion systems are considered [1, 3, 4]. In such systems one of the main elements is the controlled shockabsorber with MR fluid, named MR shockabsorber. Last years necessity of development of MR shockabsorber mathematical models and numerical estimation of its performance characteristics increases by reason of occurrence of large quantity of MR fluid compositions with various rheological properties [1, 2, 4].
Temperature factor has significant influence on rheological properties of a MR fluid, but we were not found sufficient information to describe performances characteristics of controllable shockabsorbers and any control algorithm for electronic control units taking into account of temperature. The designing of new geometry of MR shockabsorber and its elements by development of controlled cushion systems of the concrete vehicle is usually required [4, 5].
The aim of this work is simulation and analysis of performance characteristics of the designed MR shockabsorber taking into account rheological properties of MR fluid, influence of the magnetic field, temperature and such as modes of dynamic rod load under the harmonic law.
2. Problem statement
Fig. 1 shows the scheme of the magnetorheological shockabsorber and its basic elements. Hydraulic resistance is created in the annular channels 5 (Fig. 1), thus the area 3 of the channels 5 defines a regulation zone of MR fluid viscosity at influence by the magnetic field.
Fig. 1. The scheme of the MR shockabsorber: 1 – the cylinder; 2 – a MR fluid without a magnetic field; 3 – a MR fluid in the magnetic field; 4 – the piston; 5 – the annular channel; 6 – the solenoid; 7 – magnetic field lines; 8 – the rod; 9 – the pneumatic camera with a gas
At electric current, giving on the solenoid 6 (Fig. 1), creates the magnetic field with the flux 7 passing through the core which represents the piston 4 rigidly connected with the rod 8 and located in the shockabsorber cylinder 1.
Resistance force of a telescopic MR shockabsorber, depending on time $t$, is defined from the equation system [5]:
where:
where ${F}_{fr}$, ${F}_{gas}$, ${F}_{f}$ is forces of dry friction, gas friction in a pneumatic camera and hydraulic resistance of MR fluid in an annular channel. The inertia force of a MR shockabsorber piston is neglected [4, 5]; ${S}_{p}$ and ${S}_{r}$ is the area of crosssection section of a piston and a rod accordingly; ${F}_{0}$ and ${c}_{1}$ is the parameters, which define dry force from an experiment; $m$ is the index of power; $t$ is the time; $\mathrm{\Delta}P={P}_{1}\u2013{P}_{2}$ is the pressure drop; ${v}_{p}$ is the piston velocity; $z$, $r$ is the coordinates; ${R}_{p}$, ${R}_{r}$ is the piston and rod radii; ${R}_{1}$, ${R}_{2}$ is the internal and external radii of a channel; ${l}_{r}$ is the initial piston position; $B$ is the magnetic flux density; $T$ is the temperature.
Let’s define the pressure drop in an orifice channel of the piston. A flow of an incompressible viscoplastic MR fluid in the annular channel at the cylindrical coordinate system is described by the equation system, which contains movement equation, rheological equation and continuity equation:
where $\eta $ is the apparent viscosity; $u$ is the velocity; $p$ is the pressure; $\rho $ is the density of MR fluid; $Q$ is the volume flow. Volume flow of MR fluid in the channel is defined [4] from the sinusoidal law of piston displacement $x\left(t\right)={A}_{m}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\left(2\pi ft\right)$ with defined values of frequency $f$ and amplitude ${A}_{m}$:
We use net method [6] for calculation of Eq. (5)–(7).
MR fluid is considered motionless, and the noslip conditions are set on walls of an annular channel:
The MR fluid has been developed in A.V. Luikov Heat and Mass Transfer Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus [2].
Measurements of rheological properties of the MR fluid have been executed in a range of shear rates 0.011000 s^{1} on Rheometer “Physica MCR 301” of manufacturer “Anton Paar” with a measuring cell “MRD70”.
3. Results and discussion
In this work, performance characteristics of the magnetorheological shockabsorber, which is used for a controlled vibroprotective system, are modelled and numerically evaluated.
Rheological curves are constructed for the experiments at various values of magnetic flux density [2]. All of them can be described by viscoplastic model HerschelBulkley:
where parameters of dynamic yield stress ${\tau}_{0}$, plastic viscosity $\mu $ and index of power $n$ depend on magnetic flux density $B$ [in scale of mT] and temperature $T$ accordingly:
Overall relative variation coefficient of HerschelBulkley model is equal 9.8 %, that precisely enough describes viscoplastic behaviour of the MR fluid at different magnetic flux density $B$ in the range 0500 mT and temperature $T=$ 20°C [7]. The temperature dependence of yield stress ${\tau}_{0}$ and plastic viscosity $\mu $ was defined as an approximation of rheological curves of dispersion media of MR fluid from temperature. As a result, this rheological model (see Eqs. (11–14)) allows to define the general calculated dependence of shear stress on shear rate, temperature and magnetic flux density (Fig. 2).
Having defined rheological state equation in a form of HerschelBulkley model and dependences its parameters (yield stress, plastic viscosity, index of power) on magnetic flux density, the problem of MR fluid flow in an annular channel of a controlled shockabsorber taking into account construction geometry, external influence of the magnetic field and conditions of dynamic rod loading can be solved.
Fig. 2. The dependence of shear stress $\tau $ of the MR fluid on shear rate and different values of magnetic flux density: 1 – $T=$20°C; 2 – $T=$ 40°C; 2 – $T=$ 80°C
Fig. 3. The dependence of MR shockabsorber force from rod displacement $z$ at different values of magnetic flux density $B$ and temperature $T$: 1 – $B=$ 0 mT; 2 – 200; 3 – 500
a)${A}_{m}=$5 mm, $f=$1 Hz, $T=$20°C
b)${A}_{m}=$5 mm, $f=$1 Hz, $T=$80°C
For calculation of performance characteristics of the MR shockabsorber we use following data: ${R}_{r}=$0,008 m; ${R}_{p}=$0,02 m; ${R}_{1}=$0,016 m; ${R}_{2}=$0,017 m; $L=$0,03 m; ${L}_{1}={L}_{2}=$0,01 m; ${P}_{0}=$10 MPa; ${v}_{0}=$0,00009 m^{3}; $\rho =$2600 kg/m^{3}; ${F}_{0}=$60 Н; ${c}_{1}=$3·10^{6} N/Pa; ${l}_{r}=$0,08 m.
Results of numerical modelling of MR shockabsorber force are resulted in Fig. 3 at rod motion under the harmonic law with amplitude of 1, 5 and 40 mm, frequency of 0.5, 1 and 3 Hz, temperature of 20 and 80°C, magnetic flux density of 0, 200 and 500 mT. For the purpose of simplification it is admissible that the force component ${F}_{gas}$ is equal to zero.
Estimation of the maximum resistance force on the rod was realized in the rebound stroke of the MR shockabsorber due to the fact that the resistance force ${F}_{mra}$ acting on the rod in the compression stroke for this shockabsorber design is equal the resistance force ${F}_{mra}$ acting on the rod in the rebound stroke. The result of experimental data processing is shown in Fig. 4 as the dependences of the maximum resistance force of the MR shockabsorber (at rebound stroke) on the magnetic flux density $B$ and temperature $T$ by the harmonical law ${v}_{p}=2\pi {A}_{m}f\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{s}\left(2\pi ft\right)$, where ${A}_{m}$ is the amplitude of displacement, $f$ is the frequency, and $t$ is the time. Fig. 4 shows, that that resistance force grows with the magnetic flux density at different piston velocities ${v}_{p}$. So, the force at the velocity ${v}_{p}=$0.0314 m/s in an magnetic field ($E=$500 mT) and without a field ($B=$0 mT) increases 32 times, when $T=$20°C, and at $T=$80°C, 13 times.
The force ${F}_{mra}$ increases with growth of magnetic flux density (see Table 1), for example: ${F}_{mra}=$196 N (at $f=$0.5 Hz) and ${F}_{mra}=$302 N (at $f=$3 Hz) at the absence of a magnetic field, ${F}_{mra}=$6846 N (at $f=$0.5 Hz) and ${F}_{mra}=$8577 N (at $f=$3 Hz) at magnetic flux density $B=$500 mT and amplitude ${A}_{m}=$5 mm. The force ${F}_{mra}$ decreases with growth of temperature (see Table 2), for example: ${F}_{mra}=$263 N and ${F}_{mra}=$395 N at the absence of a magnetic field, ${F}_{mra}=$8781 N and ${F}_{mra}=$10198 N at magnetic flux density $B=$500 mT and amplitude ${A}_{m}=$20 mm. Similar result was obtained for the case, when ${A}_{m}$ is equal 1, 5, 40 mm.
Fig. 4. The dependence of the MR shockabsorber force on magnetic flux density $B$ and temperature $T$ at different values of piston velocity ${v}_{p}$: 1 – ${v}_{p}=$0.0031 m/s; 2 – 0.0314; 3 – 0.6283
Table 1. Estimation of the performance characteristics of the controlled MR shockabsorber at magnetic flux density $B=$ 0 and 500 mT (temperature $T=$ 20°C)
${A}_{m}$, mm

$f$, Hz

${F}_{mra}$, N

$\frac{{F}_{mra}^{}\left(B=\text{500mT}\right)}{{F}_{mra}^{}\left(B=\text{0mT}\right)}$


at $B=$ 0 mT

at $B=$ 500 mT


1

0.5

141

5669

40.1

3

204

6999

34.2


5

0.5

196

6846

34.9

3

302

8577

28.4


40

0.5

325

8907

27.4

3

531

11346

21.3

Thus, the coefficient of relative increase of force ${F}_{mra}$($B=$500 mT)$/{F}_{mra}$($B=$500 mT) is equal 40.1 and 21,3 times for different loading conditions (Table 1). Controllable characteristics of the shockabsorber have more wide changing range of resistance force at low piston velocity, when magnetic flux density varies in a range from 0 to 500 mT. Therefore, any controlled shockabsorber is necessary for developing with the annular gap, where as far as possible an average speed of MR fluid flow will be minimum.
The coefficient of relative increase of force ${F}_{mra}$($T=$20°C)$/{F}_{mra}$($T=$80°C) is equal 2 and 7.1 times for different loading conditions (Table 2). Therefore, it is very important to take into account this temperature factor whereas dependences of the performance characteristics of the MR shockabsorber on temperature strongly influence on an active vibroisolation of vehicles.
Table 2. Estimation of the performance characteristics of the controlled MR shockabsorber at temperature $T=$20 and 80°C
${A}_{m}$, mm

$f$, Hz

F_{mra}, N

$\frac{{F}_{mra}^{}\left(T=\text{20\xb0C}\right)}{{F}_{mra}^{}\left(T=\text{80\xb0C}\right)}$


$T=$20°C

$T=$80°C


at $B=$ 0 mT


1

0.5

141

71

2.0

3

204

80

2.6


40

0.5

325

96

3.4

3

531

128

4.2


at $B=$ 500 mT


1

0.5

5669

821

6.9

3

6999

1001

7.0


40

0.5

8907

1259

7.1

3

11346

1592

7.1

4. Conclusions
Thereby, the mathematical model of MR fluid flow in an annular channel of the MR shockabsorber taking into account forces of dry friction and gas friction in a pneumatic camera, dependence rheological properties of the MR fluid on shear rate, temperature and magnetic flux density is developed. Performance characteristics of the MR shockabsorber (dependence of force on rod displacement taking into account shockabsorber geometry, rheological properties of the MR fluid, magnetic flux density, temperature) are calculated. The analysis of performance characteristics is made for different loading conditions. The resistance force with growth of magnetic flux density increases 40 times. But the resistance force with growth of temperature from 20°C to 80°C decreases 7 times, in an magnetic field ($B=$500 mT), and 2 times, without a field ($B=$0 mT). These temperature dependences can be used by development of a control algorithm of shockabsorber performance characteristics for electronic control units.
Acknowledgements
This research was performed under Belarusian project “Mechanika 1.42” of Government Program of Scientific Research “Mechanics, Technical Diagnostics, Metallurgy” (20142015 years).
References
 ElectroRheological Fluids and MagnetoRheological Suspensions. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Philadelphia, USA, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2011, p. 748. [CrossRef]
 Korobko E. V., Novikova Z. A., Zhurauski M. A. Rheological and magnetic properties of magnetorheological fluids with complex dispersed phase. Conference book and Book of abstracts of 7th Annual European Rheology Conference, Suzdal, Russia, 2011, p. 114, (in Russian). [CrossRef]
 Wang X., Gordaninejad F. Dynamic modeling of semiactive ER/MR. Fluid Dampers. Proceeding of SPIE Conference on Smart Materials and Structures, Vol. 4331, 2001, p. 8291. [CrossRef]
 Dixon J. C. The Shock Absorber Handbook. Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2007. [CrossRef]
 Derbaremdiker A. D. Vehicle ShockAbsorbers. Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1985, (in Russian). [CrossRef]
 Paskonov V. M., Polezhaev V. I., Chudov L. A. Numerical Simulation of Heat and Mass Transfer Processes. Moscow: Nauka, 1984, (in Russian). [CrossRef]
 Bilyk V. A., Korobko E. V., Kuzmin V. A. Simulation of performance characteristics of a magnetorheological shockabsorber at the dependence on rheological properties from the magnetic field. Vibroengineering Procedia, Vol. 1, 2013, p. 1922. [CrossRef]